Vendor Intelligence Report: Science

Published 13 Jun 2026. 19-page investigative report on who is behind Science: corporate records, ownership, affiliate networks, and the vendor's lab-testing record. The first 3 pages are free to read on this page.

Researched and published by Finnrick Analytics. Reports draw on corporate records, affiliate-network analysis, and Finnrick's own laboratory testing record; vendors can challenge findings through the formal objections process at finnrick.com/vendor-support/objections.

Executive summary

Science.bio is not a live-source vetting problem anymore. The official domain shows a permanent closure notice, and the supplied event record places final shutdown in January 2026. Any current offer of “Science.bio” material therefore starts as residual-stock, reseller, or brand-confusion risk unless it comes with lot-level packaging, a verifiable COA, and a credible custody trail.

Across 12 Finnrick lab tests, Science posted 5 pass and 7 fail results — a 42% overall pass rate. The record is sharply product-specific: GHK-Cu is the clear bright spot, while BPC-157 and PT-141 are avoid signals in the tested set; Melanotan II sits in a small, mixed middle. The full report shows how stricter Finnrick grading changes the read where purity or fill variance matters more than label identity.

The corporate trail is more substantial than a disposable storefront, but not cleanly transparent. The report maps ANG Sciences behind Science.bio, Botany.bio as a sister brand, and IRC.bio as predecessor lineage, with personnel records and an official Reddit channel alongside an unresolved founder/operator alias. It also separates California correspondence addresses from a North Las Vegas import footprint tied to lyophilization equipment sourced from China.

The non-lab risk signals are concrete. A Botany.bio wrong-compound incident put an Alpha-GPC-facing label on product the vendor communications said contained PEA, while final-month buyer reports describe Zelle/crypto payment reconciliation failures, cancellations, and support delays. The report also distinguishes what was not found: no public FDA warning letter, no verified post-closure inventory transfer, and no live authorized-reseller system.

Inside the full report:

  • Permanent-closure exhibit and dated Science.bio/IRC.bio/Botany.bio event timeline
  • Per-product Finnrick pass/fail rates, rating trajectories, and methodology-divergence charts for all 4 tested products
  • ANG Sciences corporate-lineage map with California mailbox addresses versus the Nevada warehouse/import record
  • ImportGenius exhibit documenting the freeze-dryer shipment to North Las Vegas
  • Botany.bio Alpha-GPC/PEA mislabeling exhibit and quality-control analysis
  • Final-month payment-rail and stale coupon/affiliate promotion review

Risk assessment

  • Post-closure authenticity and fulfillment risk — high: Science.bio displays a permanent closure/sale-discontinued notice; no verified authorized reseller or custody trail for leftover inventory, with final-month Zelle/crypto complaints.
  • BPC-157 and PT-141 quality risk — high: Finnrick tested BPC-157 at 0/4 pass (38.49%) and PT-141 at 0/2 pass (47.94%); these are not recommended Science.bio products.
  • Labeling-control risk — high: Same operator's Botany.bio incident involved Alpha-GPC-labeled product that vendor communications said actually contained PEA.
  • Melanotan II quality uncertainty — medium: Finnrick tested Melanotan II at 1/2 pass with a 58.99% rating; small dataset but mixed outcome.
  • Corporate accountability risk — medium: ANG Sciences/Science Bio identities are traceable, but the founder is public mainly through an alias and several listed addresses are correspondence rather than operational sites.
  • Stale affiliate/coupon-promotion risk — medium: Scan found 10 code/link-carrying web/Reddit promoters for a now-closed vendor; 7 coupon pages lacked clear disclosure and may funnel buyers to dead or unofficial channels.